Why Classical Stereo Techniques?

In my previous post I talk about what kind of sonic imagery is present in the piece. It is essentially stereo:

1.      The tape is in stereo, exploring depth and having a sense of width.

2.      The clarinets sit symmetrically and therefore can be captured evenly in stereo.

Capturing the piece in stereo makes sense because:

1.     Stereo techniques capture depth, to a greater or lesser extent depending on the technique.

2.      Stereo techniques capture the lateral positioning of instrumentalists, again to a greater or lesser extent depending on the technique.

Stereo techniques often come with quite fixed rules. ORTF for instance is a pair of cardioid microphones with the diaphragms 17cm apart with the capsules splayed out 110 degrees apart.

All stereo techniques can be adjusted to taste, although there are schools of thought that are more scientific about this – this is not within the scope of this research. In order to give myself a variety of options for mixing it is important to plan which techniques I will record. (n.b. I have a limit of 16 channels.) 

Some Terminology:
I don't want to assume that all the readers are audio experts so I think it is worth defining some terms that I will be using frequently: 

Term	Description	Graph
Polar Pattern	Microphones do not simply pick up sound. They accept and reject sound depending on design factors. A polar pattern is defined by how it picks up unidirectionally - or not. These patterns are then plotted onto a graph to represent a microphone model’s unique pickup characterises.	N/A
Cardioid	A polar pattern that picks up principally frontally and tends to reject sounds to the rear of the mic. These mics tend not to pick up the ambience of an acoustic very well.	Image of the the polar pattern for a microtech gefell M930 microphone. (Example 1)
Omnidirectional	A polar pattern that picks up equally right around the microphone. In practice omnis are not always strictly omnidirectional and the uni-directionality of the pick up varies by frequency. These mics tend to pick up the ambience of a room very well.	Image of the polar pattern for DPA 4006a microphone. This diagram shows how the pick-up of the microphone changes depending on the frequency of the sound (essentially, omnis tend to pick-up higher frequencies more directionally) (Example 2)
Bidirectional	A polar pattern that pick up in a figure of 8 shape. These microphones reject sounds coming from the side of the mic. These mics tend to pick up the ambience of an acoustic quite well and the side rejection can be advantageous in rooms where sounds echo (slap) between the side walls.	Image of the polar pattern for one capsule of the R88 stereo ribbon mic. (Example 3)

Which techniques and why?

Array	What is it?	Why?
Faulkner Phased Array	A 4 microphones system, using a near coincident pair and a pair of omnidirectional microphones, slightly splayed out, 66 cm apart. Mics:  Shoeps CM2 Omnidirecitonal microphones Microtech Gefell M930 cardioid microphones (possibly swap out for M950s, wide cardioids, if the bass response is poor)	This array itself allows one to adjust the balance between closeness and spacious-ness. In theory this will allow me to mix a more intimate version and a more ambient version depending on the context and relative attractiveness of the acoustic. The piece is more about depth than width. Whilst the piece is wide sounding and there is plenty of lateral movement the main spatial parameter consciously composed with is relative depth between the tape and live instruments. The ability with this array to discreetly balance the perceived depth makes this potentially an ideal stereo system.
ORTF	A two-microphone system. ORTF is one of the near coincident techniques using two cardioid microphones. In ORTF they are spaced 17cm apart and angled out 110 degrees.	In a practical sense it is a part of the Faulkner array and it makes sense to record it separately. ORTF is charaterised by clear lateral imagery but often a slightly weak bass response. Swapping the M930 cardioids for M950 wide cardioids may improve the bass response - although using wide cardioids will make this no longer an ORTF array.
AB	A two-microphone system. Microphones of any polar pattern arranged so they address straight ahead. In this case, two omnidirectional microphones spaced 66cm apart.	In a practical sense AB omnis are a part of the Faulkner array and it makes sense to record it separately. AB omnis will have a very even frequency response and excellent spaciousness, but perhaps a slightly indistinct lateral stereo image.
Decca Tree	A three microphone system: 2 parallel omnidirectionals 2m apart 1 omnidirectional centre mic 1.5m ahead of the main pair. Microphones: 2 Shoeps CM2 1 other omnidirectional microphone	The decca tree is a classic stereo technique. It captures a beautiful sense of spaciousness and may allow me to simply capture the balance in the room. It may also simply capture the tape part in the room.
Outriggers	Typically Omnidirectional microphones arranged in line with the main array(s) spaced reasonably widely (perhaps as wide as the ensemble itself). (The decca tree omnis may be spaced wide enough to replace these.)	Outriggers typically add width to a recording and a sense of ambience to a main array.
Ambient Pair	Omnidirectional microphones arranged at the rear of the hall, very widely.	Ambient mics add room resonance to a recording. I will be able to use these to add ambience to any of the main arrays.
Spot Microphones	Individual microphones for each instrument. Typically cardioid microphones.	These will be used to add detail if needed and to provide a frame of reference for the other systems.

Example 1: http://www.microtechgefell.de/index.php/en/microphones/broadcast-a-recording/large-membrane-transistor-mics/211-m930

Example 2: http://www.dpamicrophones.com/en/products.aspx?c=Item&category=234&item=24385#diagrams

Example 3: http://www.ribbonmics.com/aea/R88.html

Compositional Materials in Fata Morgana

Some Assumptions

As Fata Morgana is my own piece and I know it reasonably well (!) I have many preconceptions about recording it. Most of which are probably fairly close to the mark but are worth exploring further. These include:

• Expecting classical micing techniques to produce the best results.
• Recording the tape part in the concert hall, after the quartet have played, will allow me to blend the ‘dry’ fixed electroacoustic part and the fixed part in the space more effectively with the live clarinets.
• Using close mics may add extra detail and intimacy, highlighting any breathiness present.

Whilst these thoughts may be perfectly valid it is worth thinking about the piece in more depth before making any decisions.

The General Images in the Piece:

The piece, whilst being in 4-channels, is essentially in stereo. The four-channel tape is a means to distribute sounds across a stereo sound stage. The clarinets themselves are distributed symmetrically. The tape part in live performance should not be distributed around the audience and so stereo recording techniques become the obvious choice.

Spatial Planes:

In this piece spatial width is important, but it is not discreetly composed with. There are no large left-to-right or right-to-left gestures that articulate dramatic change or sounds being panned extreme left or right in counterpoint or opposition.

Depth however, is discreetly explored, especially the relative depth between the clarinets and the fixed electroacoustic part. Fata Morgana are especially vivid mirages and the title became a frame for shaping the illusions I was creating between the live clarinets and the fixed part. The programme note sums this up:

“The image you see and hear is always changing. The clarinets, both real and recorded, come in and out of focus in a fluid and illusory way. As the image dissolves, like a mirage, the real clarinets may appear closer or more distant than they actually are. As they melt and mix together the materials they carry are re-imagined creating new perspectives that whilst different, retain the same character and essence throughout. You can never be quite sure that what appears to be on the horizon is really even there. 



'Fata Morgana' are unusually vivid, and complex mirages named after the Arthurian Sorceress Morgan La Fey. In my Fata Morgana the illusions are subtle; they are not grand tricks like a Houdini escape.”

So, because of this, one of the most important considerations is not to flatten the stereo sound stage. This tends to imply that not using too many mics at any one time will be important as often flat stereo sound stages are a result of over use of spot microphones. Whilst I will record a relatively large number of mics it will take discipline to be discerning about which ones I use in final mixes.

Localisation of Sounds

It is very easy for me as a recording engineer to assume that discreet localisation of the sounds in this piece then is less important that in other pieces. However, as the composer of the piece this is harder to assume. If depth is the most important consideration this might imply the use of omnidirectional microphones to best capture this aspect. However, whilst width is not a discreet parameter in this composition the sounds were still carefully placed to create a balanced stereo image. In order to capture the location of the sounds an XY* system will create the most accurate lateral image. However, the lack of depth in XY stereo pretty much immediately discounts it for this purpose. This leads on to a variety of stereo systems that will discussed in more detail, with relation to localization and depth, in a future blog post.

The Clarinet’s Materials

When considering what a certain kind of material is it is also worth considering what it is not. I have found it useful to define the clarinet parts with regard to temrinilogy developed in Smalley’s Space form and the Acousmatic Image where he describes performance space as

“…gesturally rooted. A human agent, using the sense of touch, or an implement, applies energy to a sounding body, producing spectromorphologies. Alternatively, internal physical energy generated from inside the human body can be applied to an external sounding body, like a wind instrument.”

Whilst this is of course true of the way the players interact with the instrumental material this piece does not foreground these actions. This is not a piece highlighting key clicks or other tiny sounds. The clarinet’s might appear “zoomed in” but it is more zooming in on the natural sound and timbre, rather than the mechanics of the insturments.

Moving away from performance space Smalley goes on to describe ensemble space as:

“Ensemble space, within which individual gestural spaces are nested, is the personal and social space among performers: a group of performers produces a collective performed space. This is revealed both visually (seeing proprioception at work, and knowing how it works) and in the music (hearing proprioception at work). In duos or small ensembles the space is more personal…”

This then is the principal “space” that the clarinets occupy in Fata Morgana. Generally they work as a unit in order to create fully formed textures of their own in order to texturally interact with the fixed part. For much of Fata Morgana the clarinets are all engaged in playing the same kinds of materials at any one time although occasionally they break off into pairs.

Smalley continues

“Sound can bind spatial zones when like behaviour creates a sonic contiguity where we cannot separately identify individuals, as with a violin section, for example. In ensemble space we witness the fabric of the music in the process of articulation – the synchronisation of a collective gesture, collaboration or competition within texture, and exchanges of materials.”

So it is this kind of space that I hope to capture. This would tend to imply that main arrays will be more effective; after all they are designed to capture a well balanced performance made by well rehearsed musicians. However, many very good recordings have also been made using individual spot mics and it is perfectly possible to create a blended sound that does not pick up unwanted key clicks or other sounds. It will be important to carefully analyse just what the different arrays capture in order to best select which microphone positions to use.

The final principal space that Smalley defines is arena space:

“Arena space is the whole public space inhabited by both performers and listeners.  An audience may be conscious of the personal and social spaces within its own zone, and certain kinds of audiences (rock concerts, clubs), through their behaviour, may seek to enhance personal and social contexts.

For our acousmatic purposes the most important aspect is that we perceive arena space as an acoustic setting, as a bounded and enclosed space produced by the nesting of gestural and ensemble spaces within it.”

Arena space is important to my research. My aim is to bring both electroacoustic and live parts into a perceivable space that they both inhabit, rather than trying to bring the instrumental part into the acousmatic fixed part. Identifying these kinds of spaces also affords me the opportunity to try to creatively move between them. For example, a more distal section could be mixed to use a more ambient recording sound and a more intimate section could be mixed to use just spot mics and the dry fixed part.

* XY stereo uses two cardioid microphones with the capsules on top of each other angled at 90 degrees.

SMALLEY, Dennis (2007), Space-Form and the acousmatic image, Organised Sound, Volume 12, pp 35-38, DOI 10.1017/S1355771807001665,

An introduction...

I am a composer of electroacoustic music, particularly it seems so-called mixed-media music that combines instruments and electronics.

I am a recording engineer.

Recently I have been thinking about the relationship between the two. Where do they inform or interpret one another? Where do they interact and suggest certain paths? Both require me to be sonically picky, a raw pursuit of sonic elegance and pristine-ness is where I feel the most commonality. More recently though I have been thinking about areas they might collide. I've perhaps not been at my most adventurous in mixing multi-track recordings of folk musics for example. However, it is the recording of mixed-music that has really led me to question my work.

At the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland I am relatively new to my job. Working day to day as a recording engineer is hard but fulfilling. I encounter many levels of performance from raw, but talented young students through to fully fledged professionals who just happen to also be studying. This work makes me acutely aware of just how important recording good performers is. I can capture a piano with sonic perfection but if it is not played with flair, skill and musicality it won't ever appear to be anything other than a mediocre recording. So I'm trying to capture a performance, not an abstract sound quality. It is a performance that I am seeking and using my skills as a musician I hope to help bring that out.

It was thinking about performance, mixed-media music and recordings that made me question what role recordings have in mixed-media music full stop. It seems almost problematic to me. There are two things going on here:

1. An acousmatic element projected by loudspeakers. There is a rich history of acousmatic music and it is music that has always been projected by loudspeakers.
2. Instrumental music, played by living performers. This music was traditionally seen as existing best within a live performance context although recordings are now extremely common and can be seen to shed new light on a composition.

Combining these two parts, one that involves invisible sounds and one involving sounds made by visible players seems to imply, to me at least, that it is important for those sounds to be made by a visible person. After all, the composer could have recorded these parts and mixed them into an acousmatic piece. It seems almost to necessitate a live performance.
So if it is important that they are visible, or perhaps perceivable, and this is an assumption I am beginning from, what of recorded realisations? Do the sounds of the instrument need to be clear and distinct? Can it ever be masked by the tape part? How can the recording engineer make the instrumental parts perceivably 'live' yet blended with the electroacoustic part?

It was questions like these that led me to begin researching this aspect of recording. It seems to me that at this point much thought has been put into the live presentation of mixed-media and fixed-media music by groups like BEAST, MANTIS, Sound Intermedia to name a few but less has been said about the way recording engineers and producers approach the question posed by mixed-media music.

Through this research it is not my goal to create a method. Different pieces will require different approaches. Music involving live electronics will differ greatly from pieces only involving fixed electroacoustic parts both technologically and philosophically. What I hope to gain for myself and to share with others is a way of thinking about the music that will lead me to more carefully consider recording methods in order to serve the music at hand.

This research is supported by an Athenaeum Small Project Award from the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland research department. These are new awards in order to allow staff to develop or complete research. To best communicate what I am trying to do and achieve this is the project outline I submitted:

"I am applying to research the recording of music for instruments and electronics (mixed-media music). There is significant research into electroacoustic methodologies and the live presentation of this music in concerts. Despite this, there is little research surrounding recorded realisations of mixed-media music. Through this research, I aim to address issues of perceptual dissonance between the instrumental and electroacoustic parts in many mixed-media recordings. That is, they do not seem to share the same apparent acoustic space. I will develop a methodology, through practice, for approaching mixed-media recording. This research will not yield a fixed method, but rather a way of thinking about and developing strategies for recording mixed-media music. I will record my composition, Fata Morgana (clarinet quartet and fixed-media). The composition has an inherent spatial matrix. Therefore, it is an ideal starting point for this research. The goal will be to manifest these spatial perspectives through the recording methods. The work will be played by the Cameo Clarinet Quartet and engineered by Bob Whitney Aims: Plan the approach to recording this composition based on the spatial matrix present in the work. Record the instrumental and fixed-media parts with various microphone techniques and placements. Collate findings surrounding microphone techniques, speaker placements and projection of the electroacoustic part.  Objectives: Create a recorded realisation of Fata Morgana where the live and pre-recorded parts are distinct, yet musically blended within the same perceptual space. Document and disseminate good practices for the approach of recording mixed-media music in the context of existing research. I will specifically target Leeds International Festival of Innovations in Music Production and Composition (iFIMPaC).

Continue this research through the recording of further mixed-media music including the release of an album with Tom Poulson to be recorded in Summer 2014."



In my next posts I will be describing how and why I have chosen various recording methods prior to recording on June 25th. I will also make a post highlighting just what I am trying to capture from the clarinet part and the electroacoustic part.